web analytics

Featured Posts

Did all the Companions of The Holy Prophet become apostate... Question: There are narrations in Shia books that all companions had become MURTAD (apostate) after the Holy Prophet (pbuh) except three. What is the Shia’s belief about it? (Imam) Abu Ja'far [as]said:...

Read more

The Iranians Gave The World The True Spirit Of Christmas... Unfortunately, most American Christians have been duped by the Jewish controlled media into believing that the greatest threat to their survival and that of their most "precious ally", the ursurping...

Read more

SABROSKY : Endgame In The Syrian Crisis   Obama’s “interesting times” (in the sense of the ancient Chinese curse) are upon him. For two decades, the US has been working its way around the Middle East, attempting to crush Israel’s...

Read more

Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive... editors note:  A tradition from the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.s) declares, "Beware I inform you regarding the greatest of the mortal sins:  1. Associating anything with Allah, 2. Disobeying parents and...

Read more

Christians In The Arab World: A Guide As Islamists come to power across much of the Middle East, Christians are facing growing persecution   Editors Note: The author(s) of this article, unwittingly, did a great service to the cause...

Read more

Frantic Push For Gun Control Driven By Fraud and Hypocrisy

Category : World Affairs

One of the strongest indicators of the imminent collapse of a nation is evident when every new policy enacted, every new law legislated and every executive order issued, consistently runs contrary to what is in the best interest of its law-abiding citizens.  An excellent example of major changes being proposed by the legislative and executive branches of the US Government designed to impose more limits on the freedoms of Americans, lies in the push to ban all private ownership of automatic and semi-automatic weapons.

To abridge the rights of citizens in the private sector to own and bear arms is an open defiance of the liberties guaranteed by the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Under the pretext of saving American lives, such a restriction would render Americans helpless and incapable of defending themselves against criminals who, because they will unequivocally defy any gun-restricting law, remain free to menace communities with criminal activities like robbery and aggravated assault.

Little Known Consequences Gun Confiscation

Every man and woman have not only the right but a God-given duty to defend themselves, family and neighbors against threats posed by any adversary, whether foreign or domestic.  No government that truly serves the people will ever place restrictions on the rights of its law-abiding citizens to defend themselves, regardless of race, class or religious affiliation.  History and current events teach us that any program of gun confiscation endorsed by a government represents the clearest sign of the emergence of a dictatorship.  In virtually every case citizen disarmament has resulted in the genocide of tens of millions of innocent people.

Regrettably, most of the law-abiding, pro gun proponents of the Second Amendment are decent Americans but are staunch opponents of Islam and convinced that Muslims are that proverbial fifth column which poses the greatest threat to America’s future.  Regardless of what Right-Wing, Tea Party one may think of Muslims, they are the last people who would ever desire to take away American’s Second Amendment rights.  The Jewish controlled western media should take credit for having implanted such fraudulent pieces of disinformation in the minds of a largely naive, dumbed-down, brainwashed, politically inept American public.  Unfortunately, the typical American customarily falls prey to the endless media-driven mind games designed to keep the people in an endless state of deep slumber.

However, despite the mainstream media’s negative portrayal of Islam and Muslims globally, many so-called gun-loving, gun-toting American would be taken aback to learn the extent to which Shariah law fully supports the provisions embodied in the Second Amendment.

An individual’s right to self-defense and protection of personal affects is a God-given right which is a hallmark of the Islamic faith. The Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did not live nor die by the sword but urged his followers to adopt violence only as a means of protection from any form of aggression against their person, families or properties. The use of violence under the leadership of the Holy Prophet was always in strict accordance with the Word of God as written in the Holy Qur’an.  The following three verses clearly illustrate this point:

Permission (to take up arms) is granted to those who are fighting because they have been oppressed…those who have been expelled from their homes without any just cause…” (Surah al-Hajj, 22:39-40)

“Fight in the way of God those who are fighting against you; and do not exceed (the limits). Verily Allãh does not love those who exceed (the limits).”  (Surah al-Baqara, 2:190)

“Prepare against them (i.e., the enemy) with whatever force and trained horses you can in order to frighten thereby Allãh’s enemy, your enemy, and others besides them who you do not know but Allãh knows them.” (Surah al-Anfal, 8:60)

The prevalence of the sword, spear, knife, and bow and arrow during the time of the Holy Prophet were the crude equivalents of today’s firearms.  Had the Muslims adopted a policy of banning all weapons none of the battles fought for the establishment Islam could have been won and the religion would have been eradicated, save for some miraculous, divinely sanctioned intervention to rescue the day.

But there is nothing contained in the Shariah that states that the use of weapons should be limited to engagements on the battle field.  Even after all the battles had been won and Islam was firmly established throughout Arabia, sword ownership along with other forms of weaponry were common throughout the Muslim communities and were routinely employed as a means of hunting and gathering, as well as tools for self defense.  This natural right to possess arms is the license  that Allah has provided all just people, so that they may be prepared for the unexpected.  This natural right is an effective  safety precaution and the excercising of this right is the best common-sense deterrent to unjust threats and possible assaults from the enemy.  Research shows that people with a predilection to violent criminal behavior are often deterred from the commission of such acts when they know their potential victims are well armed and fortified within their homes.


 Banning Guns Is Not The Solution To Curbing Violent Crime


In 1982 the city of Chicago instituted a general ban on handguns except for those previously registered before the ban took effect. Since the ban the number of murders in Chicago committed using handguns has been 40% higher than before the ban, and has been on a steady rise, adding further strength to the argument that banning guns will actually cause a steady increase in violent crime.

In comparison, let’s take a look at Britain, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the developed world. Given that one of the most vocal advocates for gun control in the aftermath of Sandy Hook has been a British citizen – Piers Morgan – who has used his platform on CNN to attack the second amendment, the contrast is illuminating

Thus, a well armed citizenry is the best solution to the problem of violent crime.  With private gun ownership being at an all-time high, thanks to record gun sales over the last five years, one could easily anticipate a dramatic increase in incidents of violent crime in America.  However, the opposite is true:  violent crime rates have actually plunged dramatically.

Many social scientists argue that more private gun ownership will ultimately lead to more accidents because the average citizen is not sufficiently trained in the proper use of a firearm.  While it is true that gun-related accidents do occur, the Cato study indicates that they are the most overstated risks. There were 535 accidental firearms deaths in 2006 within a population of almost 300 million people.  It is true that every lost life is a tragic affair but untimely deaths attributed to the accidental discharge of firearms is relatively insignificant.

On the other hand, Newsweek has reported that law-abiding American citizens using guns in self-defense during 2003 shot and killed two and one-half times as many criminals as police did, and with fewer than one-fifth as many incidents as police where an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal (2% versus 11%).  It is ironic that while the ongoing national debate about gun violence in America surges forward, violent crime itself is actually becoming less of a problem nationwide according to FBI uniform crime reports.  Notwithstanding the unprecedented, record breaking sales in firearms, over a 20 year period, gun related violence has declined over 49%.  Yet the mainstream media and the Obama Administration carefully avoids broadcasting these startling statistics to the American public.




Hollywood Con Artists Used As Pawns to Sell Gun Control Agenda


Many Hollywood actors can be some of the most despicable self-serving, narcissistic phonies in American society.  Their eagerness to sell their souls to the highest bidder in exchange for money and fame, knows no bounds. The following anti-gun promotional video reveals actors who are either hopelessly naive and ignorant of the facts surrounding guns and violence in American society or are virtual government shills posing as innocent humanitarians to destroy our rights to own and bear arms. The first video shows a large number of actors who demand that immediate action be taken to stop gun violence.




Now, carefully watch these same actors after the same video that has been professionally spliced with scenes from their very own movies.  These actors want to your guns while they make millions glorifying gun violence.  Please take note on how they revel in the art of intimidation and verbalizing threats of violence just seconds before they embark on a vicious rampage of merciless, irresponsible and senseless, murder and mass killing.  These blood-curdling assaults are carried out using an array of weapons, including controversial, fully automatic assault rifles.  Then, you be the judge.  Are these actors genuine dupes or abominable, self-seeking hypocrites?



When we observe them in the real world we discover many stars, like the average citizen, have opted to carry concealed weapons and/or hire weapon-toting bodyguards for one reason and one reason only:  to protect themselves from violent assault.

If you think the abhorrent hypocrisy displayed by Hollywood actors was not offensive enough the cunning and in-your-face hypocrisy of many American politicians are even more obscene.  Like global warming hypocrite Al Gore who warned us about the threat of the flooding of coastlines due to the eminent rise in oceans across the globe.  Nonetheless, that warning didn’t discourage him and his wife from purchasing an $8,875,000 an ocean-view villa right on the California coastline.  Take the case of Tea Party Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.), a strong supporter of pro-life and ran on a pro-life platform; he had illicit sex with one of his patients while working as a physician.  After the patient became pregnant with his child he succeeded in convincing her to get an abortion.  For public consumption Congressman DesJarlais can continue his fight to make it more difficult for women with whom he is not sleeping to obtain abortions.

Returning to the theater of gun control, the level of in-your-face hypocrisy continues to grow off the charts:  Michael Moore, a staunch advocate of strict gun control, is always accompanied by a powerful entourage of gun-toting bodyguards.  He, like almost every anti gun advocate, also owns and packs a personal firearm but arrogantly advises the public to get a dog instead.  Let’s not forget Vice President Biden’s ludricous, irresponsible and even possible criminal recommendation (it is a felony of recless indangerment to discharge a weapon in a public space) to all concerned women who want to protect themselves from intruders: get a double-barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house or even through the door!  Then there is Bill Gates, while being a strong advocate of gun control to save lives, sees nothing hypocritical about financially supporting programs of forced vaccinations to wipe out most of the world population.   However, one of the most blatant displays of double-standard hypocrisy can be seen in the following video that shows Senator Dianne Feinstein, a hard core opponent of Second Amendment rights for American citizens, defending her own right to bear arms when her life was in danger:



To those Americans who believe in the responsible ownership of firearms for the purpose of self defense, hunting and the necessity of the right to bear arms for the security of a free State, this is the irrationality and failed logic we face as we enter an unprecedented Constitutional battle.

Many of these people calling for a plan to end gun violence seem to ignore the fact that they themselves are proponents of the very senseless violence they are advocating the prevention of.

Just like the politicians who would strip us of our right to bear arms, many anti-gun advocates have concealed carry permits, often accompanied by armed bodyguards and always require that armed security be present at events that they attend.


Race and Class Discrimination Were The Original Motive For Gun Control


But let us get down to the real nuts and bolts of the government’s anti-gun movement.  Any government that embarks on a campaign to disarm its citizens is a government that is truly the enemy of the people. The entire history of gun control in America is rife with racism, cynicism and hypocrisy.  Ulterior motives that lie at the heart of America’s efforts to limit and ultimately ban private gun ownership have absolutely nothing to do with keeping the public safe but rather exercising power to limit the inalienable rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

The core of the history of gun control in America is rooted in the ugly agenda of discrimination and oppression of blacks, other non-white minorities, migrant workers and political activists. Thus, gun control laws were often enacted to disarm and facilitate repressive action against these groups.

The first gun control laws were enacted in the ante-bellum South. They forbade blacks, whether free or slave, the right to legally possess fire arms, in order to maintain blacks in a perpetual state of servitude and vulnerability to unprovoked racially motivated attacks by police-protected, bigoted white citizens. FPOGSDAfter the Civil War, the South continued to pass restrictive firearms laws in order to deprive the newly freed blacks from exercising their rights of citizenship. In the sixties additional laws restricting gun ownership were designed to suppress the social and political activities of the black civil rights movement.

Presently, the government’s on going push for gun control and restriction of the Second Amendment is no longer limited to African Americans and other social activists.  It has now grown to include provisions for the ultimate disarming of all American citizens, regardless of race, class or political perspective.

The Obama administration has demonstrated an unwavering perseverance to engage in all sorts of intrigue in order to create the political climate needed to support its drive to dismantle the Second Amendment, while declaring open season on the average disarmed American citizen according to Attorney General Eric Holder.  According to a treasonous and politically compromised Mr. Holder, President Barack Obama has the authority to use, at his discretion, weaponized drones to kill US citizens on American soil. That disclosure, combined with the fact that the US Government has purchased two billion rounds of hollow point ammunition since April, 2012 raises much suspicion.  Not only are hollow point bullets declared illegal even in war, the number recently bought by the government is enough needed to shoot each American five times or wage a 30 year civil war!  Do these intimidating postures indicative of a government that cares about its people or betray the governments real motives behind their push to destroy the Second Amendment?  Is there any wonder why gun and ammunition purchases by Americans distrustful of their government have skyrocketed in recent years? Is there any wonder why decent, law-abiding, God-fearing citizens are fighting feverishly to protect their Second Amendment rights?


It’s Not No Guns But The Lack Of Guns That Encourage Crime


One of the best pieces of evidence to debunk the popular narrative that an expansion of gun ownership places American cities in great peril can be observed when monitoring the results of unprecedented spikes in gun sales since inauguration of President Obama in 2008.  A dramatic, record-breaking increase in guns sales across North America saw a corresponding dramatic decline in violent crime.  Gun sales, alone, in 2009 exceeded 14 million.  That figure was the largest since the FBI’s National Instant Background Check System (NICS) began recording data in 1998.

There is no public threat posed by responsible, law-abiding American citizens owning guns.  The problem arises when firearms fall into the hands of irresponsible law-breakers who, because they fear no threat from a disarmed citizenry are undeterred from engaging in criminal activity.  Criminals will always arm themselves, regardless of what laws are legislated.  That being said, the only sensible thing to do to help ensure the stability and safety of society is to remove all restrictions to gun ownership for law-abiding citizens.  The arguments put forth by proponents for gun control have consistently been shown to be weak and unsound.  In contrast, the sound, fact-based arguments articulated by supporters of the legalization of firearms have shown that responsible gun ownership not only results in lower crime rates but can actually create a social climate that can serve as an effective deterrent to crime.

Despite the inherent shallowness in its arguments in favor of nullifying the Secnd Amendment, the Obama Administration wants us to believe that its drive to disarm Americans is motivated solely by its concern for their safety and well being. Unfortunately, a substantial number of Americans have, by virtue of mainstream media propaganda, unwittingly fallen for this deception.  Anyone foolish enough to believe such a deceitful narrative is totally unaware that the American political machine has been the one primarily responsible for staging most of the mass shootings and false flag terrorist attacks committed in recent years. The disturbing truth about these attacks is that many of them are used as a means to trigger such fear and indignation that the misinformed public will be conditioned to embrace the notion that destruction of the Second Amendment is the only viable solution to urban violence.


The Obama Administration Feigns Concern About Public Safety


So much for government pretense.  In closing, let us take a quick look at government hypocrisy as it relates to its desire protect public safety.  If the Obama Administration is so obsessed with saving American lives as it relates to gun violence then why is it mute on the issue of massive fluoride contamination of our water and food supplies?  Fluoride contamination is so toxic and pervasive that, in addition to lowering IQ and causing infertility, it is one of the leading causes of cancer.  If the Obama Administration is so concerned about public safety, why does it not demand that the FDA stop pressuring health care professionals to force inoculate infants, pregnant women and school children with flu vaccines contaminated with dangerous chemicals and cancer viruses?  If the Obama Administration is so worried about the welfare and safety of the American people, why is there no move by the government to ban aspartame (a deadly exito toxin and a leading cause of cancer) from our food and beverage supply?

If guns should be banned even when there is no proof that their use in the hands of law-abiding citizens poses a threat to public safety, then dangerous chemicals added to our water, food and vaccines that have been proven, following extensive clinical research, to be extremely carcinogenic should also be banned. If the US government was sincere about its concern for the safety of Americans it would have worked to protect the Delaney amendment to the Federal Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act of 1958. This amendment stipulated that leaders of the food, water and drug industries conduct their affairs so as to remain in strict accordance with the guidelines established by the late Congressman James Delaney.

It is obvious the government has no genuine concern about your safety.  That being said, what about your local police officer?  Not much hope there either, seeing that the Supreme Court has ruled that your local police do not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm. Thus, if anyone still entertains any doubts about how critically important it is for us to be armed and to not depend on the police for advice or protection, just watch the insane responses given by the police:


Each American Must Take Personal Responsibility

The facts don’t lie.  Where there is more gun ownership there is less crime.  Period.  All the supporting documented evidence has been already been suffuciently sited.  The stories of guns being used to save lives and property in America each year number in the hundreds of thousands.  Yet the national media deliberately avoids mentioning.  Instead they focus only on guns being used by thugs engaged in criminal activity or individuals on dangerous psychotropic drugs who carry out staged mass shootings.  Many of the accounts provided by thousands of people about how their lives were saved because of having access to firearms are so compelling and breathtaking, the consequences of national media coverage to them would expose the entire campaign for gun control as a fraud and ultimately derail both Washington’s and Hollywood’s concerted push for citizen disarmament.  It is not only a fight to save the Second Amendment.  This movement is about protecting your God-given rights to protect yourself and your loved-ones all forms of danger.